February 26, 2017, 03:13:35 AM
News: If it is not in arbusers, it doesn't exist.
BetBurger | Live and Pre-game surebets

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - MaxShalamar

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 91
1
PremiumTradings / Re: PremiumTradings seized 265,000€ of me
« on: Yesterday at 01:35:37 PM »
Just out of interest how many members here who are customers of PT are considering or already taking their funds and running?

I'm sure even if PT is silent they are still monitoring replies here - doing the right thing will greatly help their PR - even a moron can see that

2
Arbing and trading talk / Re: Pinnacle leaving Poland and Ireland
« on: Yesterday at 12:11:10 AM »
i would kill to pay taxes on gambling related earnings..

You may have to :P

3
PremiumTradings / Re: PremiumTradings seized 265,000€ of me
« on: Yesterday at 12:07:09 AM »
If they are willing to pay 199k then they know they are in the wrong - stick with it and hold out for the full amount :)


The fact that this was passed to legal and not financial shows they knew they were in the wrong and it became damage limitation IMO

Their biggest loss is the loss of trust of every customer who has heard about this conflict and who are probably looking at alternatives

4
Exchanges / Re: exchanges closing accounts
« on: February 24, 2017, 02:20:05 PM »
Matchbook certainly offer fake liquidity as I said in the Matchbook thread - every horse having £12 available on the back and lay side is a sure sign :D

5
PremiumTradings / Re: PremiumTradings seized 265,000€ of me
« on: February 23, 2017, 11:27:17 PM »
https://www.premiumtradings.com/en/terms-and-conditions/nolayout/#agents

2.1 You need to have at least 5 active players each month starting two months after opening an agent account.

2.5 Agent can win up to EUR200,000 (or equivalent in other currencies) per agent code per day, and EUR1,000,000 per week, all according to the sportsbook time zone (for removal of any doubt, player's limits, as detailed on chapter "Finance" clause 7 shall be valid for agent's players as well). Any additional winning amount will be redeemed by the company.

PT are saying that there is only one customer betting through the OP - that is the dispute it seems now

So maybe PT should show evidence that there are less than 5 active players operating through this agent or the OP should prove there are - either way will resolve the dispute

6
PremiumTradings / Re: PremiumTradings seized 265,000€ of me
« on: February 23, 2017, 06:34:33 PM »
Quote
As for the silence, I see both sides being silent and that makes me believe that there is something going on that we do not know so far.

Quite possibly but PT could easily put this to bed in their favour by posting their evidence but they have not - not enough to contravene data protection but enough to clear them in the eyes of their customers which I'm sure they are losing on a daily basis while this remains unresolved

Their silence is more indicative of the situation IMO (just my opinion as I don't have all the facts either) - as I said if PT are in the right they can easily dismiss the allegations with their own proof but they haven't

At the end of the day someone is going to lose and it looks like both parties will lose big time here

7
PremiumTradings / Re: PremiumTradings seized 265,000€ of me
« on: February 23, 2017, 05:26:58 PM »
Finally caught up with this topic


efeomr did provide proof of the accepted bets at Pinbet as requested from Nikos and others and still no response from PT

Quote
how looks like your betting statement by days?
how they describe -265.000E transaction, I mean put on description. (withdraw?)

I'm also interested to see how PT class the removal of funds on the statement

Some people have that offending clause in their T&Cs and some don't and it is obvious some users have had their T&Cs changed maybe without their knowledge - is this fraud , an oversight or different T&Cs for different countries?

If the T&Cs have been changed then PT would have a record of the customer agreeing to them - can they provide this evidence? Also PT should not accept action from any customer who has not agreed to any change in the T&Cs

Seems like a lawyer and a lengthy and expensive action is the only course of action left given the refusal of PT do do the right thing and maybe they haven't considered the loss of income they have already suffered and in the future because their conduct over this makes them look dodgy TBH

People should really consider if this could happen to them too and take the appropriate action


8
Other investments / Re: Looking for Sports Betting Investor
« on: February 22, 2017, 10:05:43 PM »
For $800 a month fee you would need to make a consistent profit of more than $10k per month from 1-2 bets a day to make it worthwhile

Not viable IMO

If you need to follow the tips of someone else you really shouldn't be in the game because you don't understand the business enough to find your own edge

9
Exchanges / Re: exchanges closing accounts
« on: February 20, 2017, 03:05:24 PM »
I'd think any exchange would close an account if their rules were broken

"Winning" would not be the reason as they make commission on you winning so TBH that reason is BS and the people closed are telling porkies

10
Arbing and trading talk / Re: Bet365 banning very fast
« on: February 19, 2017, 08:07:18 PM »
every smart guy is attacking 365

To call B365 a scam is pretty pathetic - if you play by the rules they limit you but never take your funds
Multi-accounters and other cheaters on the other hand deserve what they get - you know the risks so stop crying :)

11
Arbing and trading talk / Re: so much lay betting before event
« on: February 19, 2017, 06:39:36 PM »
Nothing unusual about it - it's trader money

Lay big at 1.02 with very little liability and if a couple of quick goals go in trade out for a massive profit at about 1.10

12
BetBurger / Re: BetBurger.com - Your ideas, propositions and conserns!
« on: February 19, 2017, 02:43:57 PM »
So there were no problems when I reported big delays last week but there are now?

I suddenly feel like a liar and wasting your time

13
BetBurger / Re: BetBurger.com - Your ideas, propositions and conserns!
« on: February 19, 2017, 11:24:23 AM »
Quote
We have significantly accelerated William Hill scanning this week.

Really?? -  last week you said there was nothing you could do because of the source - no difference in the accuracy of Hills today - still 9 out of 10 are wrong

Jetbull is out unless you place an arb 2 or 3 days before the event - useless

Yes, we have sped up the bookie this week. The problem (not updated odds) is related to the scanning source. The bookie supplies us with such data. We tried another scanning method, but there were lots of gaps.

What concerns Jetbull, the issue is already known and now in the process of fixing. We kindly ask you to wait a little bit more because the problem is not an easy one. As soon as it is solved, we'll let you know.

Quote
Yes, there are some scanning problems with these bookies (except Jetbull).

That is what you said last week - now you realise there is a problem?
How can we take any answer you give seriously?


14
BetBurger / Re: BetBurger.com - Your ideas, propositions and conserns!
« on: February 18, 2017, 05:19:32 PM »
Quote
We have significantly accelerated William Hill scanning this week.

Really?? -  last week you said there was nothing you could do because of the source - no difference in the accuracy of Hills today - still 9 out of 10 are wrong

Jetbull is out unless you place an arb 2 or 3 days before the event - useless

15
BetBurger / Re: BetBurger.com - Your ideas, propositions and conserns!
« on: February 18, 2017, 03:57:38 PM »
BB is the only arb service that doesn't redirect to the slip at BF Sportsbook - no idea why

We don't need a plugin - just an efficient service with the minimum of delays - especially on major books like Hills

We have significantly accelerated William Hill scanning this week.
What concerns BF Sportsbook, we'll implement redirect to betslip next week.
If you're aware that some service has a redirect better than we have (web-only versions, not from programs), please inform us immediately.

Surebet.com is the best example of a redirect from web site to BF SB betslip as I have said numerous times over the last few months

Oddsmonkey also does

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 91