Hi Arbusers,
I have read a lot of the threads on this forum. My question is, if you always lose on the soft-bookie by betting the underdog in that bookie, why would they limit your account? I mean they are making money off of you right? Ocassionally you might won, but overall, the soft bookie's EV of catering to your bets will be +. I am sure a lot of people has experienced this but I couldn't find an answer in this forum. Also, would it help if you always bet in amounts that are not suspicious such as 10,20,25,100,250? Rather than 98, 107, 154?
If you're strategy is always bet 100$ on the underdog, how would they detect you as an arber? Solely from betting the same opportunities as other arbers?
Avoid being limited by soft bookies
- Carni
- Gaining experience
- Karma: 4
Post
Re: Avoid being limited by soft bookies
If they are the soft bookie, then by definition your bets are +EV for you, and -EV for the bookie, regardless of the fact that they're the underdog.
So your question doesn't make much sense. The bookie is losing money to you in the long run.
So your question doesn't make much sense. The bookie is losing money to you in the long run.
- nidaime
- Gaining experience
- Karma: 1
Post
Re: Avoid being limited by soft bookies
can you clarify it? I bet 100$ 50 times. The bookie earns $5K assuming I lose it all due to selecting the underdog. How is that negative EV for them?
It is +EV for me because I have an additional position in another bookie. But as far as the soft bookie is concerned, he is earning money from me right?
It is +EV for me because I have an additional position in another bookie. But as far as the soft bookie is concerned, he is earning money from me right?
- arbusers
- Administrator
- Contact:
- Karma: 625
- Thordin
- Totally Pro
- Karma: 30
Post
Re: Avoid being limited by soft bookies
I bet you would win 5 or more out of 50.
Picking losers is hard!
Picking losers is hard!
- cristi13
- To become a Pro
- Karma: 6
Post
Let's take an easy fictitious example:
Favorite is 1.40 at sharp book.
Underdog is 3.80 at soft book. This is a 2.3% arb.
Lets say favourite has 70% chance of winning and underdog has 30%.
Favorite: 70*1.4=98% return, so on average you lose 2% of the bet.
Underdog: 30*3.8=114% return, so on average you win 14%.
Re: Avoid being limited by soft bookies
That's the typical recreational player mentality, that by betting favorites you will win, and it's wrong.nidaime wrote: can you clarify it? I bet 100$ 50 times. The bookie earns $5K assuming I lose it all due to selecting the underdog. How is that negative EV for them?
Let's take an easy fictitious example:
Favorite is 1.40 at sharp book.
Underdog is 3.80 at soft book. This is a 2.3% arb.
Lets say favourite has 70% chance of winning and underdog has 30%.
Favorite: 70*1.4=98% return, so on average you lose 2% of the bet.
Underdog: 30*3.8=114% return, so on average you win 14%.
Last edited by cristi13 on Sun Nov 02, 2014 10:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
dr
Post
Re: Avoid being limited by soft bookies
how do you know its 70:30 though? if it'd be 80:20, your math checks out.
edit: i mean, you can't calculate the chances of winning for any team. you can only estimate it. and if you estimate it, you can pick any odds and say, this odd is +ev for me, because i estimated the chance of winning is xy%. now, my estimation alone doesn't make a bet +ev ... so how would you know the real chances of winning and whether the bet is +-ev ?
edit: i mean, you can't calculate the chances of winning for any team. you can only estimate it. and if you estimate it, you can pick any odds and say, this odd is +ev for me, because i estimated the chance of winning is xy%. now, my estimation alone doesn't make a bet +ev ... so how would you know the real chances of winning and whether the bet is +-ev ?
Last edited by drhoo on Sun Nov 02, 2014 11:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
- cristi13
- To become a Pro
- Karma: 6
Post
Re: Avoid being limited by soft bookies
80% would yield a 12% ROI.
What's your yield on sharps? My guess is that it's much closer to -2% than to +12%.
What's your yield on sharps? My guess is that it's much closer to -2% than to +12%.
-
dr
Post
Re: Avoid being limited by soft bookies
ok how about 72:28
either way, it's still an estimation.
either way, it's still an estimation.
- nidaime
- Gaining experience
- Karma: 1
Post
There might be a few games that are mispriced here and there but in the end, we will blow all our money in the soft bookie and we will have to redeposit again. Now isn't that what a soft bookie wants?
Is the fact that we are always betting the underdog also a red flag that we are an arber??
Thanks for your opinion guys.
Re: Avoid being limited by soft bookies
What I am saying is by betting the underdog at the soft bookie we wil lose most of the time. By most I mean we will end up -EV. We are also assuming the market is X% correct (where X is sufficiently high), that the favorite will always win. The fact that we are not even accounting outside information about our bet, it already means we are -EV. Betting the underdog everytime isn't a good strategy right? But the odds are good so that's our reason for betting.cristi13 wrote:That's the typical recreational player mentality, that by betting favorites you will win, and it's wrong.nidaime wrote: can you clarify it? I bet 100$ 50 times. The bookie earns $5K assuming I lose it all due to selecting the underdog. How is that negative EV for them?
Let's take an easy fictitious example:
Favorite is 1.40 at sharp book.
Underdog is 3.80 at soft book. This is a 2.3% arb.
Lets say favourite has 70% chance of winning and underdog has 30%.
Favorite: 70*1.4=98% return, so on average you lose 2% of the bet.
Underdog: 30*3.8=114% return, so on average you win 14%.
There might be a few games that are mispriced here and there but in the end, we will blow all our money in the soft bookie and we will have to redeposit again. Now isn't that what a soft bookie wants?
Is the fact that we are always betting the underdog also a red flag that we are an arber??
Thanks for your opinion guys.
- Thordin
- Totally Pro
- Karma: 30
Post
Re: Avoid being limited by soft bookies
If that theory worked, bank at the softbook getting busted because we bet the underdogs, why bother placing the bets there in the first place?
We could bet only the favourite side on the sharps and win more
But it wont work, those few times that the underdog will win will bring you profit enough to cover the previous losses,simply because the prices on the underdogs that you will be picking will be overpriced.
And that is what value betting is about, which you should study closer.
We could bet only the favourite side on the sharps and win more
But it wont work, those few times that the underdog will win will bring you profit enough to cover the previous losses,simply because the prices on the underdogs that you will be picking will be overpriced.
And that is what value betting is about, which you should study closer.
- Arbman
- Gaining experience
- Karma: 1
Post
Re: Avoid being limited by soft bookies
Pretty sure its the opposite and bookies would be much happier with you backing odds on 1.15 shots every weekend. Look at Barcelona yesterday, Dortmund at home to Hannover last weekend. These results happen more then you would think.