NETELLER'S VEGAS PROMOTION AND UNETHICAL PRACTISES

Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NETELLER'S VEGAS PROMOTION AND UNETHICAL PRACTISES  (Read 1022 times)
cortomaltese
Probably a Pro
****

Karma: 16
Posts: 345



View Profile

cortomaltese

NETELLER'S VEGAS PROMOTION AND UNETHICAL PRACTISES
« on: December 03, 2016, 11:42:55 AM »

As most of us know neteller recently launched their so called "VEGAS PROMOTION"
This promotion was divided to some periods and everybody who hit his personal target of eligible transactions was supposed to take a 10% cashback (with a max cashback amount of 1.5k usd!!!) for his eligible transactions until end of period 1 which was until 18 of November.
I must admit that this was too good to be true and my guess was that eventually neteller  will find a way not to pay these cashbacks ofcourse after these eligible transactions  made and produce some nice profits for neteller
Well , guess what?!
neteller changed the promotion's t&c's in Dec 2 retrospectively !!!
They added some excluded merchants ,  but the best part is this "cash prizes for customers whose NETELLER VIP status was Silver, Bronze, or lower as of 02
November 2016 will be limited to $150 in period 1 and 2."
Hahahahaha  .... good ehh?
So one month or more from their initial t&c's they change retrospectively terms and reduce pretty much  everybody's   cashback from 1.5k to 150!!!
Of course they was stating even in their initial t&c's that they can change them or even " end the Promotion at any time in their sole discretion"

Now , if that's not unethical practices i don't know what is!!!
Logged
luctens
Probably a Pro
****

Karma: -42
Posts: 314


View Profile

luctens

Re: NETELLER'S VEGAS PROMOTION AND UNETHICAL PRACTISES
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2016, 08:06:35 PM »

As most of us know neteller recently launched their so called "VEGAS PROMOTION"
This promotion was divided to some periods and everybody who hit his personal target of eligible transactions was supposed to take a 10% cashback (with a max cashback amount of 1.5k usd!!!) for his eligible transactions until end of period 1 which was until 18 of November.
I must admit that this was too good to be true and my guess was that eventually neteller  will find a way not to pay these cashbacks ofcourse after these eligible transactions  made and produce some nice profits for neteller
Well , guess what?!
neteller changed the promotion's t&c's in Dec 2 retrospectively !!!
They added some excluded merchants ,  but the best part is this "cash prizes for customers whose NETELLER VIP status was Silver, Bronze, or lower as of 02
November 2016 will be limited to $150 in period 1 and 2."
Hahahahaha  .... good ehh?
So one month or more from their initial t&c's they change retrospectively terms and reduce pretty much  everybody's   cashback from 1.5k to 150!!!
Of course they was stating even in their initial t&c's that they can change them or even " end the Promotion at any time in their sole discretion"

Now , if that's not unethical practices i don't know what is!!!
That's a complete joke. I don't care if they had any term saying they could change any of the terms, I can't see any term of that nature being a term that would be considered fair in any way, shape or form in a court of law, and for that reason if it went as far as court, I can't see anyway Neteller could wriggle out of it.

It's like a bookmaker advertising a £100 bonus and then after you've signed up they tell you they're only going to give you a £5 bonus. The bookmaker wouldn't have any grounds whatsoever not to pay you the £100 bonus and I expect even IBAS would rule in the customer's favour in that sort of case without needing to go to court or anything.

If you want to take it further, contact the FCA to see if there's any comeback on this from their side, as I don't see any differences between that example of a bookie not being able to change their bonus conditions in such a way and what Neteller have done.

If the FCA say they can't help and you want to do anything further about this, legal action is the way to go if you want to take it that far as I can't see anyway Neteller could argue this in their favour in a court of law and if faced with legal action they may even settle it before court knowing how silly they'd sound in court, and you could perhaps get other arbers etc that have been swindled by this to get in on the act and teach Neteller a lesson in a group legal case.

Companies in the gambling industry need to be put in their place in these sorts of situations and made aware that they can't completely run riot over customers with no consequences.
« Last Edit: December 03, 2016, 08:19:31 PM by luctens » Logged
Thordin
Pro
*****

Karma: 24
Posts: 797


View Profile

Thordin

Re: NETELLER'S VEGAS PROMOTION AND UNETHICAL PRACTISES
« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2016, 11:46:58 AM »

Sadly, if you decide to take it any further, you may get your account closed ''as a business decision'' or some crap like that.
Logged
cortomaltese
Probably a Pro
****

Karma: 16
Posts: 345



View Profile

cortomaltese

Re: NETELLER'S VEGAS PROMOTION AND UNETHICAL PRACTISES
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2016, 06:54:04 AM »

I am thinking seriously to take this issue further
It's not about the money , it's about  justice.
This kind of practises are similar with scum bookies at their worst!
Logged
barbero
Has some experience
**

Karma: 10
Posts: 165


View Profile

barbero

Re: NETELLER'S VEGAS PROMOTION AND UNETHICAL PRACTISES
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2016, 12:34:35 AM »

Pretty obvious, but if you're gonna go for it, do make sure you take screenshots of every single transaction in your account before they close it and you have no more access...

And if you do go for it... thanks! I firmly believe this is good for all of us, in general. These scam companies absolutely need to be put to justice, as has been stated.

Good luck!
Logged
Bubbles
Getting better
***

Karma: 6
Posts: 272


View Profile

Bubbles

Re: NETELLER'S VEGAS PROMOTION AND UNETHICAL PRACTISES
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2016, 09:55:19 PM »

Avoid them like the plague! - that's the best action. Use only as the last resort
Logged
Pages: [1]
Print