I do realise that I could have maybe been more efficient with the accounts I have had access to and made a lot more money in the process. The last 10 months has been a great learning curve for myself as well as proving me with some nice profit and I would like to think if I could go back and do everything again I would indeed make more. On completion of 12 months value betting I will go over all my records and experiences and will put together a new plan for the following 12 months. Hopefully it will out perform this years.tomkruiz wrote: I've examined the data, thanks again. I must say I am a little disappointed though. The 32k profit for 10 months seems nice at first, but the fact that you had to use 100 accounts kinda brings it down for me. Not everyone is able to access that many accounts. I wonder would those accounts last longer if you would limit the maximum odds to say 1.95. But when you filter out those bets with odds higher than 1.95, the profit cuts down to roughly 2k. Or even if you filter out everything above 2.00, it is still under 3k. Value betting requires a considerable effort, so making a profit of under 300 a month doesn't make it seem worth.
On the other hand, I am impressed by the fact that you had been staking on both prematch and live. There is no way you could be catching value bets manually when playing live, right? So there must have been some alert service involved. Also, I'd like to comment on, at the first glance, inexplicably high stake on odds 13.00 for market "Match result and over 3/4 goals" on October 6th 2018, game between Oster and Landskrona. The inexplicably high stake on that game when compared to the other stakes gotta be because one of the two is true - the game was either fixed and you knew it, or the EV was too damn high. Right?
In regards to the Osters game, this was a mistake in the bookmakers odds which I thought would be palped but to my surprise was paid out in full. You would be surprised how much this actually happens.