1xbet
- arbbetting
- Gaining experience
- Karma: 3
- cortomaltese
- Pro
- Karma: 33
Post
What i am not getting with that skype verification thing is that you can always claim that you don't have a camera , how would they react to that?
Re: 1xbet
May i ask from which country you are?arbbetting wrote: I was asked for skype verification, and I'm not from Russia. Verification was done in english language.
What i am not getting with that skype verification thing is that you can always claim that you don't have a camera , how would they react to that?
- arbbetting
- Gaining experience
- Karma: 3
Post
Re: 1xbet
They say to buy one If you want your money back, you must that.cortomaltese wrote:May i ask from which country you are?arbbetting wrote: I was asked for skype verification, and I'm not from Russia. Verification was done in english language.
What i am not getting with that skype verification thing is that you can always claim that you don't have a camera , how would they react to that?
- arbbetting
- Gaining experience
- Karma: 3
- luctens
- To become a Pro
- Karma: -39
Post
Re: 1xbet
I don't get 1xBet. They have extremely low margins, even down to 1% recently on some major markets, but they obviously don't like sharp play because they limit people.
I would have thought a low margin bookie would be playing to a more sharp punter audience but that obviously isn't the case and I can't see them playing to too many recreationals with the look of their website, the odds format etc so they are in a bit of a half way house as to what market they are targeting. In my opinion they don't appeal to either fun or sharp punters.
Marathonbet seem similar to me. Horrible looking website which is basically a list of numbers on each screen, confusing odds for the fun punter and no existing customer offers to speak of so can't see them attracting much loyal mug punter audience. They had an advert yesterday on a site which boasted 1.50% tennis margins, but the recreational punter isn't going to really understand or care what margin they are at, it is only the sharp punter that cares about that, but they repeatedly quickly limit sharp punters so I don't know what they are getting at with that sort of advert.
Both bookies are a mystery to me in that they are both low margin so traditionally would be playing to the sharps but they don't and I can't see them playing much to the recreational audience so I'm really not sure what sort of customer they are attracting with the way they operate.
I would have thought a low margin bookie would be playing to a more sharp punter audience but that obviously isn't the case and I can't see them playing to too many recreationals with the look of their website, the odds format etc so they are in a bit of a half way house as to what market they are targeting. In my opinion they don't appeal to either fun or sharp punters.
Marathonbet seem similar to me. Horrible looking website which is basically a list of numbers on each screen, confusing odds for the fun punter and no existing customer offers to speak of so can't see them attracting much loyal mug punter audience. They had an advert yesterday on a site which boasted 1.50% tennis margins, but the recreational punter isn't going to really understand or care what margin they are at, it is only the sharp punter that cares about that, but they repeatedly quickly limit sharp punters so I don't know what they are getting at with that sort of advert.
Both bookies are a mystery to me in that they are both low margin so traditionally would be playing to the sharps but they don't and I can't see them playing much to the recreational audience so I'm really not sure what sort of customer they are attracting with the way they operate.
- arber_PL
- To become a Pro
- Karma: 4
- Location: Warsaw
Post
Re: 1xbet
Maybe these guys?luctens wrote: I don't get 1xBet. They have extremely low margins, even down to 1% recently on some major markets, but they obviously don't like sharp play because they limit people.
I would have thought a low margin bookie would be playing to a more sharp punter audience but that obviously isn't the case and I can't see them playing to too many recreationals with the look of their website, the odds format etc so they are in a bit of a half way house as to what market they are targeting. In my opinion they don't appeal to either fun or sharp punters.
Marathonbet seem similar to me. Horrible looking website which is basically a list of numbers on each screen, confusing odds for the fun punter and no existing customer offers to speak of so can't see them attracting much loyal mug punter audience. They had an advert yesterday on a site which boasted 1.50% tennis margins, but the recreational punter isn't going to really understand or care what margin they are at, it is only the sharp punter that cares about that, but they repeatedly quickly limit sharp punters so I don't know what they are getting at with that sort of advert.
Both bookies are a mystery to me in that they are both low margin so traditionally would be playing to the sharps but they don't and I can't see them playing much to the recreational audience so I'm really not sure what sort of customer they are attracting with the way they operate.