As I said in my introduction we do not use poker and we only stay within betting and casino spheres. It is not me who decides the strategy. Our strategists have their criteria. I am sure there are 100s of casino games that can be beaten with advantage play. To make things clear, no game can be beaten without a bonus. You must calculate the value of each bonus and then see if you can have a profit in the long run.cigo wrote: I never look into casino games how to beat tham. But like i know the only game you can beat online casino is poker. Of course with affiliate abuse you can beat tham on any game. I asume if you beat online casinos, you beat tham in poker or with welcome bonuses, and you play punto blanco(of few other games wher casino have low advantage) wher the loses are very low on long term. But I asume you dont know this thinks
We dont do affiliate abuse. I know some people made millions from it back in the days but I believe this is not possible anymore as casinos are able to spot it and even combine information from various platform.
Now that is a good question. On average online action represents a bigger share of our profits. But this is not the case for every country. For example, there are countries where 100% of profits come from online action, and there are other countries where 100% comes from offline. Other countries are somewhere in the middle. More on that when I start posting about individual countries and the way we work there.Wolfie wrote: @campeones Does most of your betting profit come from online betting or from shop betting ?
Yes, we have a problem with account limitations, but not at the same level like retail arbers and bonus hunters. Depending on several factors our accounts live for years and years and they keep making money month by month. Of course there will be a day when some accounts will be limited or completely closed. In these cases we replace it with another. Our betting with agents is limited and probably there will not be any after a couple of years. Agents are only needed when you are arbing. We don't use agents for value betting, we are not pushing bets of other people, we are not dependent on them.Camma23 wrote: @campeones how will the company cope with (obvious) account limitations ?
I think every smart bettor must face it at some point, unless your action is only via Asian agents, but if I got well your business this is not the case
Exactly.CharlieSheen99 wrote: It's a reality that cooperation between more and more people is what is needed to jump to a level that others can't.
Now read this carefully. Yes, the bookmakers have the right to refuse providing service. They can kick you whenever they want. We have seen the Spanish case but this is a hybrid and we dont know how it ended. But, TOS, T&Cs or anything else no matter how you call it, is not above the law of any country. In some countries by clicking the box saying accept it is like signing a contract. But in some other countries no electronic contracts are recognised by the law. And the only contracts with legal power are those signed in paper between parties. In these countries any TOS or T&Cs have absolutely no value. The bookmakers know this and they are very careful with these countries. And that is one of the reasons why accounts from country A are restricted after 2 bets, while accounts from country B who bet at the same 2 bets are free to continue.ex-hft wrote: I thought that the main problem with writing a poker bot is that it is against the TOS of most (all?) poker sites, and you end up kicked out.
Isn't it so?