Arbusers

got it . ty Mr Arbuser

arbusers wrote: ↑

Sat Mar 18, 2023 7:35 pm

Pha Mulan wrote: ↑

Sat Mar 18, 2023 10:07 am

Can I have one copy?

The Cliff wrote: Can you please send me a copy?

Sent to both of you guys.

Thank you very much!!

I am also interested, thank you

Thanks to OP for sharing this. Could you please send me one?

I didnt recieve mine, was expecting it in the inbox or no?

jagas wrote: ↑

Mon Mar 20, 2023 10:13 am

I didnt recieve mine, was expecting it in the inbox or no?

Of course you received it, but for the 3rd time, I am asking you to whitelist arbusers@arbusers.com. This is for all email providers and especially Yahoo. I will send again the document later today to the new team of people requesting it, and I will include your email again.

boro wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 19, 2023 10:27 am

I am also interested, thank you

Francisco wrote: Thanks to OP for sharing this. Could you please send me one?

jagas wrote:I didnt recieve mine, was expecting it in the inbox or no?

It is sent to all 3 of you guys.

thanks to the author of the post for giving true knowledge, you are smart and a Lord.

pkpunter wrote: ↑

Tue Mar 21, 2023 9:11 am

thanks to the author of the post for giving true knowledge, you are smart and a Lord.

I asume you read the script. And if you use sharp bookies only (betfair, smarkets,...) , you will have liquidety problems.
But for those who use softs this is good tactic to lower bet action, and get slower limits at softs.

I tested this tactic also a litle on other sports (even tennis at home/away markets, odds moved normaly in the direction i predicted. But i never loked if i would be positeve if I would bet on my selection only on shart booki). So here is still a lot of homework and testing neded to do on other sports.

I can also tell you that with help of this system we had yield around 30%-40% (odds around 2 - 2,5) on top socer leages, (over/under market), trading on betfair. Big liqidety markets. We tested this system for 2-3 years (you cant use this system at first 10 rounds, and last 5 rounds in soccer season).
At the end we tested this system on around 200 soccer games. This system is inposible to back-tested. The system was so profitable, that we even trade it on pinnacle time to time
You will ask why I stoped?
1. becouse I dont belive yield 40% on long term is realistic
2. I would need at list 10k games to test to be sure in the system ( I have only one life)
3. Its dificult to find this oportunetys. You stay all day infron on PC, and you maybe get 1 game to bet on. So its frustrating to do it.
4. Many may ask what about automation? System is so statisticly complex, that no bot can automate this system

Once again all very interesting and common sense , what I can add is that probably not even a history of 10k games is needed to test the goodness of the system , if already every 10 matches you are in front of the closing line 7-8 times and repeat this 10 times (100 matches), I have little doubt that we are on the right side of the fence. As far as operations and finding opportunities are concerned, I agree that a considerable amount of work must be employed, having to do everything manually and not automatizable, I agree that a personal sensitivity is also needed which must be applied on a case-by-case basis. I might have some ideas to facilitate the search for opportunities to enter but since I still have to work, I prefer to wait to publish them for the moment or possibly talk about them privately. Thanks again and a good continuation for everything to you.

pkpunter wrote: ↑

Tue Mar 21, 2023 3:29 pm

Once again all very interesting and common sense , what I can add is that probably not even a history of 10k games is needed to test the goodness of the system , if already every 10 matches you are in front of the closing line 7-8 times and repeat this 10 times (100 matches), I have little doubt that we are on the right side of the fence. As far as operations and finding opportunities are concerned, I agree that a considerable amount of work must be employed, having to do everything manually and not automatizable, I agree that a personal sensitivity is also needed which must be applied on a case-by-case basis. I might have some ideas to facilitate the search for opportunities to enter but since I still have to work, I prefer to wait to publish them for the moment or possibly talk about them privately. Thanks again and a good continuation for everything to you.

What are the best times to catch the values at soft bookmakers?

cronosone wrote: ↑

Wed Mar 22, 2023 12:28 pm

Hello! I'd love to receive the script too to take a look into it.

Best regards.

Sent.

Dean wrote: ↑

Wed Mar 22, 2023 6:19 pm

pkpunter wrote: ↑

Tue Mar 21, 2023 3:29 pm

Once again all very interesting and common sense , what I can add is that probably not even a history of 10k games is needed to test the goodness of the system , if already every 10 matches you are in front of the closing line 7-8 times and repeat this 10 times (100 matches), I have little doubt that we are on the right side of the fence. As far as operations and finding opportunities are concerned, I agree that a considerable amount of work must be employed, having to do everything manually and not automatizable, I agree that a personal sensitivity is also needed which must be applied on a case-by-case basis. I might have some ideas to facilitate the search for opportunities to enter but since I still have to work, I prefer to wait to publish them for the moment or possibly talk about them privately. Thanks again and a good continuation for everything to you.

What are the best times to catch the values at soft bookmakers?

I did in the morning 9:00-11:00 UK time zone.

But you can do it also later for races that start later

pkpunter wrote: ↑

Tue Mar 21, 2023 3:29 pm

Once again all very interesting and common sense , what I can add is that probably not even a history of 10k games is needed to test the goodness of the system , if already every 10 matches you are in front of the closing line 7-8 times and repeat this 10 times (100 matches), I have little doubt that we are on the right side of the fence. As far as operations and finding opportunities are concerned, I agree that a considerable amount of work must be employed, having to do everything manually and not automatizable, I agree that a personal sensitivity is also needed which must be applied on a case-by-case basis. I might have some ideas to facilitate the search for opportunities to enter but since I still have to work, I prefer to wait to publish them for the moment or possibly talk about them privately. Thanks again and a good continuation for everything to you.

For inplay system that i was testing for 2 years i did in on inplay.
So no way to test, if i can beat closing odds

Hi, I would like to have one as well.

Thank you