I have arbed for a few years. I have lost too much at Pinnalce than soft bookies somehow. I can see like this posts sometimes. Is this just a coincidence ? Is it due to variance ?
I'd like to test whether it is just due to variance or not. The reason is if it becomes obvious that it is due to wrong odds at soft bookies we can earn more by placing a bet only at soft bookies when you find a arb between Pinnalce and soft. Huge data is necessary for satisfactory conclusion. So could you post your answer here ?
Which have you won much more at ? If there is no difference between them, please post as such.
Have you lost much more at Pinnacle than at soft bookies ?
- w62upr
- Has experience
- Karma: 3
- Yngwie
- Pro
- Karma: 22
Post
Re: Have you lost much more at Pinnacle than at soft bookies ?
This question is like,
Do you believe in law of gravity?
Have you lost much more at Pinnacle than at soft bookies? The answer is "YES" for every arber, %100. Why? Because you're picking "value" odds at softbooks and you're covering other side at Pinnacle. We're doomed to lose at sharp books and win at softbooks.
Do you believe in law of gravity?
Have you lost much more at Pinnacle than at soft bookies? The answer is "YES" for every arber, %100. Why? Because you're picking "value" odds at softbooks and you're covering other side at Pinnacle. We're doomed to lose at sharp books and win at softbooks.
Last edited by Yngwie on Wed Feb 05, 2014 5:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
