Somewhere on the forum, someone said when they emailed the Orbit regulator, later that helped.
Another possibility: account-suspended-orbit-t7703/87940#p87940
Thanks Friend for the suggestion, however I had already read the post, I tried the solution, but the Curacao regulator replied that it is not able to provide me with his helparb12 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2023 8:34 pm
Somewhere on the forum, someone said when they emailed the Orbit regulator, later that helped.
Another possibility: account-suspended-orbit-t7703/87940#p87940
schollionär wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 12:54 pmI'm happy that this forum gives you the possibility to show your case to a wider public, although the forum earns money as an BIA affiliate. So I think also arbusers could have a natural interest in BIA having a good reputation.
Hi good evening, thanks for your intervention.schollionär wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 12:54 pmHi pkpunter, your case is really interesting from the outside. I wish BIA or Orbit, or both would comment on it. The lack of transparency is really an issue I see with Orbit but also with BIA over the last years. Most people here will remember the "Cricket-Situation" earlier this year. I personally also think that BIA is a solid company but their reputation took some hits lately. I would prefer to see them commenting on this stuff, rather than being quiet and let time solve the problems. Its not my business, but i dont like the strategy.
I'm happy that this forum gives you the possibility to show your case to a wider public, although the forum earns money as an BIA affiliate. So I think also arbusers could have a natural interest in BIA having a good reputation.
As far as I see it, you placed arbitrage bets on a market which orbit took off the table. It seems likely that your suspension is somehow linked to this. Would you mind explaning your bets in this market a little bit more concrete? For us as readers, we can not really judge what you did and if there is something involved which could be considered as fraudulent behaviour. This is nothing personal, but there is obviously an incentive for you to present your story in a way that helps your interests. And maybe we miss someting of the whole picture.
Anyways I wish you the best of luck and I wish all of us that we get a clearer picture of what is going on here. I totally agree with you, that orbit should put their cards on the table and tell you, why they suspended your account. And BIA should stop telling the"normal betting overview" story, i dont think anyone is buying this.
I dont want to be too off-topic, but isn't your business by definition a problem for the gambling sector.arbusers wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 1:22 pmschollionär wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 12:54 pmI'm happy that this forum gives you the possibility to show your case to a wider public, although the forum earns money as an BIA affiliate. So I think also arbusers could have a natural interest in BIA having a good reputation.
We want the smart betting community to survive and flourish, because the forum's existence depends on the existence of the community. If players leave this sphere one after another, then we are also doomed. If companies offering services to our community fail, or stop offering services to the community, we are again doomed. Actually, there is no other actor in this industry that stakes much in the well being and the existence of the ecosystem.
Thank you for the explanation of what you where doing. I tend to believe it (if that matters for anyone). So, if it's like that, we have a serious problem with orbit, if they first flag you as loser and then when variance hits them, giving you the red card and probably making up some story. If stories like this coming up more regularly in the near future, this will back-fire on them heavily.pkpunter wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 5:22 pmI would like to add that if this was the motivation, when it happened to me in career, to "weigh a hand" wrong, I have always paid my choices, re -evaluated and went on.
As I think should do a professional in front of a customer who has always behaved regularly.
Moreover, I am absolutely not certain that there was value in the long term from orbit/fair on that market, still present on Betfair.uk indeed, but clearly with minors liquidities, it could have been simply a negative variance that we are all destined to suffer .. . Even the best (small off topic)
schollionär wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 5:45 pmYou (help to self-) educate people to beat the market. A market which only can flourish if so-called dumb money is put into it on regulary basis. I'm pretty sure you know about this dilemma by yourself, but what do you think of the future of this ecosystem. Don't you think there can be a point in time where the relation between smart and dumbmoney is just too bad for regular bookmakers. I believe we are already seeing the signs for a few years now.
In a perfect world where people wouldn't be too greedy this might work, but only few folks who develop the skillset to exploit the system for their own well-being can be enough to substantially damage the ecosystem you are talking about. But future will tell, Thank you for your input anyways.
Oh yes you can bet that it's all true, 1.01@ is big values that I would not offer you hahaha.schollionär wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 5:48 pmThank you for the explanation of what you where doing. I tend to believe it (if that matters for anyone). So, if it's like that, we have a serious problem with orbit, if they first flag you as loser and then when variance hits them, giving you the red card and probably making up some story. If stories like this coming up more regularly in the near future, this will back-fire on them heavily.pkpunter wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 5:22 pmI would like to add that if this was the motivation, when it happened to me in career, to "weigh a hand" wrong, I have always paid my choices, re -evaluated and went on.
As I think should do a professional in front of a customer who has always behaved regularly.
Moreover, I am absolutely not certain that there was value in the long term from orbit/fair on that market, still present on Betfair.uk indeed, but clearly with minors liquidities, it could have been simply a negative variance that we are all destined to suffer .. . Even the best (small off topic)
Apart from that even if your story is not the (whole) truth their lack of transparency is a problem for its own.