Arbusers

Hi, is anyone here part of a syndicate?

I have a thought for more than 1 year and i do not know if it can be done because of the 5 seconds delay when we bet live on football(exchanges).
The idea is based on 2 people, one at home and one at the stadium with phone communication or a hidden camera even better.
I have watched the markets for months and i see how the odds drop usually on the favourite team when they create a dangerous attack.

Someone could say you can do it alone but i do not think that is the case. If you do it with your phone alone in the stadium you cannot be efficient and fast enough to get in and out like you do with a software dedicated for exchanges.

Anyway if someone wants to try it out let me know. I am always open to cooperate with smart people.

I believe you should have a look at the following: courtsiding-and-sports-betting-t3862/

I believe you are referring to football games. Bookmakers have someone in the stadium that signals with his joystick when an event happens. I guess there is infrastructure mutual shared among many bookmakers to cut the costs. Maybe you should be looking for games with no representative from bookmakers.
Another thing to consider for some events is the TV coverage and the delay it comes with.

I assume that it occurs to almost everyone, and such things then do not work.

but it's probably worth a try, especially in smaller markets.

This fascinates me, how I can have a bet on every village match of my own person.

a separate chapter is the speed of TV transmissions. The best are feeds, that is a signal that only goes to the transmission car and from there to the others

@arbusers

I am referring to football games but it does not really matter what sport will be.
I have thought every possible scenario and i have checked the markets as i said for a long time and i see how they react on a dangerous attack in football.

For example tennis is the easiest but we need a network to make it happen.
TV coverage from my experience has nothing to do with Betfair's odds because professionals with high tech models conquer the markets.

@boro

I agree about smaller leagues but there is no liquidity there, so i woud bet only on them only if there was a goal and i could beat the 5 seconds delay otherwise i do not know if it is worth it.

But you see all these are assumptions and if we do not try we will never find the truth.
Also TV transmissions have delay, to make this work even with scalping big sums we need no delay that is why i wrote we need one in the stadium with live hidden cam or phone communication to call the shots.

Nah. You are 8 years behind. You could either bet mainstream games (impossible to get any edge and beat the clock) where liquidity is decent or low divisions games = crap liquidity doesnt matter exchange or soft bookies (and in soft bookies you're gonna be instantly limited if not funds frozen). Second issue: will you do it locally which cuts lots of possibilities or ask someone you know online to cooperate? If you ask someone to attend the stadium, how you can trust him? Even if he manage to beat the clock, most probably wont need you anymore and because of being greedy hes gonna try to bet himself and grab all money for himself. Anyway, you either will pay a lot for travelling/tickets with no guarantee at all you can get any advantage any soon. Try it and you will find out how impossible it is. Btw. dont forget that bookies dont like such people, you can read all over the internet about people being inprisoned in Australia courtsiding tennis. Wont happen to you you may say? I said that too courtsiding years ago, when I was approached during the match by stewards of who knows who it was, brought to a room, questioned a lot and warned next time im there and they will call the police. This isnt easy money like you may think. Dont get me wrong, it is possible to get advantage these days but its almost pointless considering the risk and costs.