Arbusers

Hi, i am using surebet monitor and
http://en.surebet.com/surebets

i have choosen the same bookies on both. But on surebetmonitor it found me one surebet 0,2% and on surebet.com/users/sign_up?affiliate_code=arbusers&zone=arbusers" target="_blank" class="postlink autolinks">surebet.com found me 5surebets from 0,5% to 10%. Where the problem? Why it is like this? iam so dissapointed of surebetmonitor

probably the 'engines' have different filters when crawling for arbs.

yes, youre telling truth but so different? Nobets vs count %bets around 12-15?

Mi_t_is wrote: yes, youre telling truth but so different? Nobets vs count %bets around 12-15?

TBH when i tryed SBM even free sites were showing more real arbs than them...they have to improve a lot...its not all about the price....

You are harsh with them. It is not that bad.

Arbitrage count as a quantity is a factor of well done work covering as much tournaments parsing the bookmakers and matching as much events as possible at any time.
Paid services should be one step in front of free ones.
I believe the problem with Surebet Monitor was temporary, if any problem persist at all.

Rebelbetting let me to try 1 week with them to compare which one has better quality and more surebets on my bookmakers.

I will let you know ..
Nowadays surebetmonitor is a little worse, i dont have there any bets (or i have one, which closes in 15second so i cant bet it). Now they are three bets around 12-18% which are not good (one bet is for match and other for 1st set)

Such arbs are the reason why you have to double check the bets on bookies websites before placing them. The service will not take responsability in such cases, it is covered in their terms.